Delhi HC to hear PIL against internet shutdown at Jantar Mantar
UPSC / SSC current affairs note · Polity
Why in news
The Delhi High Court has agreed to urgently hear a Public Interest Litigation challenging the government's decision to suspend mobile internet services at Jantar Mantar during student protests. The plea argues that the shutdown is arbitrary and violates fundamental rights, seeking judicial review of the directive.
Background
Jantar Mantar in Delhi is a designated protest site. Internet shutdowns have been used by authorities to prevent the spread of misinformation and maintain public order during protests. However, such actions have been criticized for infringing on freedom of speech and access to information.
Key facts
Delhi High Court will urgently hear a PIL against internet suspension at Jantar Mantar.
The suspension was imposed amid student protests at the site.
The plea calls the shutdown arbitrary and a violation of fundamental rights.
The PIL seeks judicial review of the government's directive.
Internet shutdowns are often justified on grounds of public order but face legal challenges.
Prelims pointers
- Delhi High Court
- Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
- Jantar Mantar
- Fundamental Rights (Article 19, Article 21)
- Internet shutdown
- Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017
Mains angles
- Discuss the balance between national security/public order and fundamental rights in the context of internet shutdowns.
- Critically examine the role of judiciary in reviewing executive actions on internet suspensions.
- Analyze the legal framework governing internet shutdowns in India and its compatibility with constitutional guarantees.